打印本文 打印本文  關閉窗口 關閉窗口  
      2000年考研翻譯題及參考答案
      作者:佚名  文章來源:轉載  點擊數  更新時間:2007-11-24  文章錄入:admin  責任編輯:admin

       

      1997年考研翻譯題及參考答案

       

      Part English-Chinese Translation

      Directions: Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET 2. (15 points)

      Do animals have rights? This is how the question is usually put. It sounds like a useful, ground-clearing way to start. 31)Actually, it isn’t, because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights, which is something the world does not have.

      On one view of rights, to be sure, it necessarily follows that animals have none. 32)Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract, as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements. Therefore animals cannot have rights. The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd, for exactly the same reason, so is the idea that tigers have rights. However, this is only one account, and by no means an uncontested one. It denies rights not only to animals but also to some people—for instance, to infants, the mentally incapable and future generations. In addition, it is unclear what force a contract can have for people who never consented to it: how do you reply to somebody who says “ I don’t like this contract”?

      The point is this: without agreement on the rights of people, arguing about the rights of animals is fruitless. 33)It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consideration humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all. This is a false choice. Better to start with another, more fundamental, question: is the way we treat animals a moral issue at all?

      Many deny it. 34)Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice. Any regard for the suffering of animals is seen as a mistake—a sentimental displacement of feeling that should properly be directed to other humans.(www.nmet168.com)

      This view, which holds that torturing a monkey is morally equivalent to chopping wood, may seem bravely “logical”. In fact it is simply shallow: the confused centre is right to reject it. The most elementary form of moral reasoning—the ethical equivalent of learning to crawl—is to weigh other’s interests against one’s own. This in turn requires sympathy and imagination: without which there is no capacity for moral thought. To see an animal in pain is enough, for most, to engage sympathy. 35)When that happens, it is not a mistake: it is mankind’s instinct for moral reasoning in action, an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.

      31. 事實并非如此,因為這種問法是以人們對人的權利有一種共識為基礎的,而這種共識并不存在。

      32. 有些哲學家論證說,權利只存在于社會契約中,是責任與權益交換的一部分。

      33. 這種說法從一開始就將討論引向兩個極端,它使人們認為應該這樣對待動物:要么像對人類自身一樣關切體諒,要么完全冷漠無情。

      34. 這類人持極端看法,認為人與動物在各相關方面都不相同,對待動物無須考慮道德問題。

      35. 這種反應并不是錯誤,這是人類用道德觀念進行推理的本能在起作用。這種本能應該得到鼓勵,而不應該遭到嘲笑。

       

       

      上一頁  [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]  下一頁

      打印本文 打印本文  關閉窗口 關閉窗口  
      主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产成人综合欧美精品久久| 我和小雪在ktv被一群男生小说 | 99精品久久久中文字幕| 日日AV拍夜夜添久久免费| 亚洲AV无码一区二区二三区软件| 欧美牲交a欧美牲交aⅴ久久| 伊人久久大香线蕉AV成人| 精品国产香蕉伊思人在线又爽又黄 | 正能量www正能量免费网站| 免费人成年激情视频在线观看| 绿巨人app入口| 国产99热在线观看| 野花社区视频www| 国产成人亚洲精品91专区高清| sss欧美华人整片在线观看| 国产精品美女一区二区三区| 99热久久这里只精品国产www| 女生张开腿让男生通| 三级黄色在线观看| 成年免费视频黄网站在线观看| 久久久久亚洲av无码专区喷水| 日韩午夜视频在线观看| 九九久久精品国产AV片国产| 最近中文字幕高清中文字幕无| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久2020| 欧美性大战久久久久久| 亚洲欧美中文日韩在线| 每日更新在线观看av| 亚洲精品午夜国产va久久成人| 澳门a毛片免费观看| 亚洲色婷婷一区二区三区| 狠狠色狠狠色综合日日不卡| 你是我的女人中文字幕高清| 福利一区福利二区| 免费看国产曰批40分钟| 精品三级久久久久久久电影聊斋| 加勒比HEZYO黑人专区| 精品伊人久久久久7777人| 兽皇videos极品另类| 粗喘撞吟np文古代| 免费无遮挡无码永久视频|