打印本文 打印本文  關(guān)閉窗口 關(guān)閉窗口  
      2000年考研翻譯題及參考答案
      作者:佚名  文章來(lái)源:轉(zhuǎn)載  點(diǎn)擊數(shù)  更新時(shí)間:2007-11-24  文章錄入:admin  責(zé)任編輯:admin

       

      1997年考研翻譯題及參考答案

       

      Part English-Chinese Translation

      Directions: Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET 2. (15 points)

      Do animals have rights? This is how the question is usually put. It sounds like a useful, ground-clearing way to start. 31)Actually, it isn’t, because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights, which is something the world does not have.

      On one view of rights, to be sure, it necessarily follows that animals have none. 32)Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract, as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements. Therefore animals cannot have rights. The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd, for exactly the same reason, so is the idea that tigers have rights. However, this is only one account, and by no means an uncontested one. It denies rights not only to animals but also to some people—for instance, to infants, the mentally incapable and future generations. In addition, it is unclear what force a contract can have for people who never consented to it: how do you reply to somebody who says “ I don’t like this contract”?

      The point is this: without agreement on the rights of people, arguing about the rights of animals is fruitless. 33)It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consideration humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all. This is a false choice. Better to start with another, more fundamental, question: is the way we treat animals a moral issue at all?

      Many deny it. 34)Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice. Any regard for the suffering of animals is seen as a mistake—a sentimental displacement of feeling that should properly be directed to other humans.(www.nmet168.com)

      This view, which holds that torturing a monkey is morally equivalent to chopping wood, may seem bravely “l(fā)ogical”. In fact it is simply shallow: the confused centre is right to reject it. The most elementary form of moral reasoning—the ethical equivalent of learning to crawl—is to weigh other’s interests against one’s own. This in turn requires sympathy and imagination: without which there is no capacity for moral thought. To see an animal in pain is enough, for most, to engage sympathy. 35)When that happens, it is not a mistake: it is mankind’s instinct for moral reasoning in action, an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.

      31. 事實(shí)并非如此,因?yàn)檫@種問(wèn)法是以人們對(duì)人的權(quán)利有一種共識(shí)為基礎(chǔ)的,而這種共識(shí)并不存在。

      32. 有些哲學(xué)家論證說(shuō),權(quán)利只存在于社會(huì)契約中,是責(zé)任與權(quán)益交換的一部分。

      33. 這種說(shuō)法從一開(kāi)始就將討論引向兩個(gè)極端,它使人們認(rèn)為應(yīng)該這樣對(duì)待動(dòng)物:要么像對(duì)人類(lèi)自身一樣關(guān)切體諒,要么完全冷漠無(wú)情。

      34. 這類(lèi)人持極端看法,認(rèn)為人與動(dòng)物在各相關(guān)方面都不相同,對(duì)待動(dòng)物無(wú)須考慮道德問(wèn)題。

      35. 這種反應(yīng)并不是錯(cuò)誤,這是人類(lèi)用道德觀念進(jìn)行推理的本能在起作用。這種本能應(yīng)該得到鼓勵(lì),而不應(yīng)該遭到嘲笑。

       

       

      上一頁(yè)  [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]  下一頁(yè)

      打印本文 打印本文  關(guān)閉窗口 關(guān)閉窗口  
      主站蜘蛛池模板: 免费一级国产大片| 在厨房被强行侵犯中文字幕| 亚洲av第一网站久章草| 波多野结衣在线观看一区| 又粗又硬又大又爽免费视频播放 | 恋男乱女颖莉慰问军营是第几章| 久久精品国产亚洲AV蜜臀色欲| 欧美在线观看视频网站| 伊人久久大香线蕉精品| 精品无码国产污污污免费网站国产| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频金莲 | 国产性生交xxxxx免费| 国产极品大学生酒店| 国产女人视频免费观看| 国产亚洲欧美日韩在线观看一区二区| 国产美女无遮挡免费视频网站| 中文字幕在线视频精品| 日韩人妻潮喷中文在线视频| 亚洲午夜国产片在线观看| 欧美黑人巨大白妞出浆| 你是我的女人中文字幕高清| 精品国产美女福利到在线不卡| 日韩欧美二区在线观看| 免费A级毛片在线播放不收费| 约会只c不y什么意思| 国产三区视频在线观看| 麻豆国产高清精品国在线| 国产激情视频在线| 18欧美乱大交| 国产高清视频网站| 99aiav国产精品视频| 成人欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 中文字幕乱码中文乱码51精品| 日韩中文字幕视频在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕无码av在线| 欧美性xxxxx极品| 恋恋视频2mm极品写真 | 日韩男人的天堂| 亚洲人成影院在线无码按摩店| 污黄视频在线看| 交换交换乱杂烩系列yy|